Skip to main content

14 months later.....

I tend to roll my eyes a bit (figuratively) when bloggers apologize for not posting for a while.  I can't imagine readers sitting on tenterhooks waiting for posts and getting offended if someone takes a week or two off!  Perhaps taking over a year's break is a little more strange.  However, I would bet my hat that no one has really cared all that much or been in the least offended, so I won't apologize, just explain a little.

Last summer was a large family reunion that's held every 5 years or so, with 100-150 attendees.  10 years ago I had offered to write a family history book, and had never actually finished it.  Hence my entire spring was taken up with finishing this book.  I actually lost a fair bit of eyesight, apparently permanently, with the many hours, days, weeks on the computer.  I did genealogy research that found ancestors back to the late 1400s!  To be accurate, my research consisted of finding other people's online research and figuring out where it fit into our family tree.  This still took many many hours, days, and weeks, but was very exciting and rewarding.  I also spent time interviewing my aunts, reading online history magazines to find articles about my ancestors, and, most time of all, harassing my many cousins for their stories.   I wanted it not to be professionally bound, so that future reunions could produce updates in the family tree and address lists, etc., that could be easily added.  So I decided to use binders with a clear cover page holder.  It didn't look quite as professional but kept the cost down when I caught a local office supply store going out of business with binders at a dollar each.

As much as I loved doing this book, it completely burnt me out and I didn't want to look at a computer or keyboard for a very long time!  Not to mention needing to rest my eyes.  In the meantime my dear husband decided to help me out by changing my computer over for another, in which a lot of my stuff was lost or moved without trace.  Later he helped out by taking my computer suddenly to reformat it, which lost more stuff.  I did recently find some of my scans of old photos, and decided to give this another go.  I don't have the money any more to buy more Ebay photos but still have two boxes of them which should keep me going for a while!

In the next post I will update on comments that have come in while I was taking my "Sabbatical."  For now, I'll just get 'er started with a couple of photos.

As usual, please click on the photos to see them bigger for more detail.  In the photo below, the children's faces and their clothing deserve a closer look.  There's something about all the detail in these beautiful old photos.  The second boy on the left has a retouched eye, too.  I wonder if the camera caught him winking, and Mom was none too pleased.

Here are five beautiful sisters.

Both of these photos are from an Ebay seller who got them from a photographer going out of business in a small town in the U.S.   The shop made copies of old family photos during the 1980s, and these are copies that never got picked up and weren't able to be traced

Comments

Sara said…
I checked in every once in a while to see if you were back up and running. Can't wait to see the pics from your boxes!
anyjazz said…
Ebay seldom has bargains in old photographs. The best source is the small junk store in a small town or suburb. Not the "antique mall" where the vendors get together on prices, but the the lone dealer in an old storefront. They are often happy to make any kind of sale.
Natalia said…
Anyjazz, I haven't bought any from Ebay in several years. It used to be you could get them for better deals. Around here you almost NEVER find them in the antique/junk stores, however I did find 2 today, shock of shocks. They were not in my usual subject matter of interest but I bought them anyway because one was signed and one is a grave so I hope to post them to find their families.

thanks for your comment! So glad to have you visit. :)
Natalia said…
Sara, I'm sorry I didn't reply, I don't seem to be receiving notification any more at all. Frustrating! I have certainly been AWOL but will one day get back here and post. :) Thank you so much for your comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Cox, Hershey, Bickmore, Isaacks, Armistead, Kellogg, Schroeder, unknown, and Anthony families.

April 2010 Please see updated information in the comments, and I've copied some of it under the Isaacks family halfway down this post. These are all linked from Ancient Faces. To see the original entry go to ancientfaces.com and search the names. Cox family, 1927. Left to right: Marion Absolom Cox, aged 36, b Feb 26, 1899; John Larkin Cox, b Aug 15, 1895; Alva Louis Cox, b Mar 20, 1901; Gilbert Raymond Cox, b Jan 2, 1904; Mary Cox, b Oct 13, 1886; Robert Dale Cox, b Nov 2, 1909; Mary Melvina {McReynolds} Cox, b Oct 10, 1871; John 'Turkey' Cox, b Aug 24, 1859. Henry (b Feb 13, 1820) Hershey and Caroline Good Hershey (b Feb 5, 1824) family. Children are: Alvin E Hershey, b Feb 28, 1842; Mary A Hershey, b Jul 10, 1843; Malinda G Hershey, b May 10, 1845; Nancy A Hershey, b Jan 18, 1848; Benjamin Hershey, b Feb 8, 1850. UPDATE: July 2009: "Keith" writes (slightly adjusted): Just a quick note to say I love your blog and it came to a surprise while s...

Long awaited additions....

I don't know anyone but myself who has long awaited any additions to this picture blog, but isn't it best to assume the positive? Here are some photos from various genealogy or other sites. These are just thumbnails to tempt you. Clicking on the photo or on the link I give should link you to the family's site, to the page where the photo is. This is for courtesy and possibly copyright reasons. The Jacob-Buys family. Clicking on the picture above will take you to the original site, where names are listed under the photo. Upon reading a little further, I came up with these interesting points about this Dutch family. There were 19 children; two were born after this photo. Their given names were actually much more "interesting" than the ones under the photo. They are very Latin sounding. There were 60 grandchildren, from 9 of the children in the photo. Of the other 10 children in this family... 3 died as babies (3rd, 11th, and 18th children) 4 took holy orders (7...

Talmon, Weir, Shafer, Switzler, Mcginnis, Hawkins, Parsley, Yeager, Lacey, Sanders, Campbell, Morlang, Eckles, Reed, Lesher, Fossett, etc, families

These are all linked from Ancient Faces. To see the original entry go to ancientfaces.com and search the names. Talmon family Weir family, taken Feb 1936. Front: Charles McEwan Weir, 15, b Jan 3, 1920; Mary Helen McEwan Weir, 5, b Nov 8, 1930; Ann Addison Weir, 48, b May 21, 1888; William McEwan Weir, 13, b Jul 28, 1933 Back: George Weir, 24, b Nov 7, 1911; Charles McEwan Weir, 51, b Oct 11, 1885; Ralph Weir, 23, b Jun 16, 1914 Albert and Nelsena Shafer family portrait, taken December 24, 1908. Amazing family. Children range in age from 26 down to infant. Babies in front: Edna Geneva Shafer, 3,b Mar 17, 1905; Hazel Nelsena Shafer, 5, b Jan 15, 1903; Mildred Shafer, 6 mos, b Jul 18, 1908 Middle: George Elmer Shafer, 21, b Nov 18, 1887; Albert Shafer, 52, b Sep 28, 1858; Lawrence Chester Shafer, 10, b May 20, 1898; Martha Nelsena Sjurson Shafer, 42, b Apr 11, 1863; Harold Neil Shafer, 8, b Apr 28, 1900; Zona Louise Shafer, 26, b Dec 4, 1882 Back: Josephine Isabelle Shafer, 14, b Jun 19, ...